You know the clinical problem. We turn it into a product.
Ten years of shipped health products. And the judgment about what not to build.
Clinicians, researchers and health founders come to us with an observation, not a spec. The Lab's job is to find out whether it can become a product people rely on. Then we make it real enough to find out.
Bring us your idea →20 minutes with both of us. No deck required. Or send the observation in two paragraphs.
You bring the expertise. We bring the product.
- 01
Care and research software
Patient-facing products, clinician workflows, data made legible and knowledge tools.
- 02
Regulation named early
Where regulation matters, we name the assumptions at the start. You don’t discover them late.
- 03
Reviewed before users arrive
Privacy, data handling, security, AI behaviour and what a real user could break. We check it all before a real user touches it.
Five health products, five different questions.
Can scattered health data tell one coherent story?
A broad longevity ambition narrowed into a first product people could hold: lab results, habits and biomarkers in one reading, shipped across iOS, Android and web.
See the case study →
Which five studies matter to this clinician, today?
A knowledge-sharing platform used by medical associations, modernized end to end. Now a physician's question reaches the colleague who can answer it.
See the case study →
A DEXA scan is precise. Does the patient understand it?
Technician workflow and patient-facing platform connecting scan, report and history. Clinical accuracy on one side. A readable answer on the other.
See the case study →
Can a therapy tool fit how a clinician actually works?
A native iOS app for psychotherapists, designed around real session workflow so notes, scheduling and client history stay out of the way of the conversation.
See the case study →
Can you monitor wellbeing without another survey nobody fills in?
A mobile app that tracks workforce wellbeing through light daily signals instead of long surveys, so teams see problems early.
See the case study →Your expertise stays the source of truth.
- 01We sit with how you actually do the work. We look at the judgment call, not the summary of it.
- 02We name the user: patient, clinician, researcher, admin. Rarely all four.
- 03We decide what the product may decide, and what a human must review.
- 04We write down the regulatory and data assumptions before they become surprises.
- 05We put the smallest version in front of five real users and listen.
You'll talk to the two people doing the work. No account layer, no handoff.
Bring us your idea →Same three ways in, health questions attached.
We check if there is a product here and who it is for. We define what would have to be true, including the regulatory assumptions.
A working core experience you can put in front of five clinicians and watch them use it.
A real product for real users: data handling, consent, auth and a security review included.
Tell us what you keep seeing in your practice.
Twenty minutes with both of us. Bring the observation; we'll tell you the smallest experiment worth running.